Oppressive and disproportionate extradition request refused

19.12.16 | |

 

The High Court allowed an appeal against the extradition of a man wanted to stand trial in Poland. The Appellant was accused of fraudulently providing employment certificates which were used to obtain loans in 2004, but was never arrested or questioned about the offences. There was no evidence he knew anything about the allegation, or had fled the country, concealed his whereabouts or evaded arrest.

 

Represented by Malcolm Hawkes, the Appellant successfully argued the district judge misapplied the test in relation to the passage of time, wrongly cited from the lead authority on Article 8, erred in several factual respects and failed to consider the refusal to interview him in the UK as an alternative to extradition.

 

The High Court concluded that extradition would be oppressive and disproportionate and discharged the warrant pursuant to ss. 14 and 21A of the Extradition Act 2003.

 

In Kazaniecki v Poland, Malcolm was instructed by Ania Grudzinska of Aneta Maziarz solicitors.

« Back to listing

About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)