Theo Huckle QC and Christopher Johnson explore asbestos exposure guidance limits and the foreseeability of injury

10.07.17 | |

Practitioners should be aware of the current dispute as to the correctness and binding nature of Williams v Birmingham University on liability for low level exposures to asbestos in the 1970s, with a view to challenging that decision as conflicting with Maguire and or Jeromson, decisions which themselves (should have) bound the later Court of Appeal. In our view Williams and its progeny remain eminently challengeable... 

 

Read the full article here

« Back to listing

About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)