Alasdair is regularly instructed in appeals to the Upper Tribunal and the Court of Appeal and in judicial reviews in both the High Court and Upper Tribunal. He appears frequently before the Upper Tribunal and First-Tier Tribunal in all areas of immigration law, including refugee, human rights, family, EEA, student, points-based system, bail and deportation cases.
He also appears in judicial reviews of trafficking decisions and age assessments.
Alasdair is recommended in Band 2 by Chambers and Partners 2020 as ‘simply superb: a wonderful advocate who understands the finer points of the law’ and as ‘exceptionally level-headed and focused, very good with difficult clients, and has a way of simplifying things that appear complicated’. In Chambers and Partners 2019, he was described as ‘efficient, responsive, strategic, and very generous with his time and ideas’ and his work was said to be ‘to a very high standard and delivered well in advance of deadlines’. In the Legal 500, he is recommended as a leading junior, and it is said that he has ‘has both vast legal knowledge and a practical, down-to-earth approach’.
He contributed chapters on asylum and human rights claims to the Legal Action Group book on Foreign National Prisoners. He is a contributor to Halsbury’s Laws and the Administrative Court Digest, and has written for publications including the New Law Journal, the Journal of Immigration, Asylum and Nationality Law and the European Human Rights Law Review.
Before joining Doughty Street from pupillage in 2005, Alasdair spent many years as a campaigner and advice worker on behalf of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK. He was among the founders of the charity Asylum Aid, of which he was Co-ordinator from 1990 to 2002. He spent some years as an executive committee member of the Immigration Law Practitioners’ Association, of which he remains an active member, and is a former Chair of the Asylum Rights Campaign and of the Refugee Legal Group. He has acted as an expert consultant to the Immigration Services Commissioner, the regulator of immigration advisers. Alasdair has written or contributed to a number of significant reports and publications on asylum and immigration issues.
Alasdair regularly appears in points-based system appeals before the Upper Tribunal and First-tier Tribunal in related judicial reviews, including R (Alnuaimi) v SSHD (challenge to refusal of ILR to spouse of points-based system migrant).
Alasdair specialises in asylum and human rights work, in particular in complex issues such as mental health, rights of appeal and exclusion from refugee status. He has been counsel in numerous completed or proposed Country Guidance cases in the Tribunal, including the leading judgment on the risks facing asylum applicants from Sri Lanka, GJ (post-civil war: returnees) Sri Lanka. He also appeared as junior counsel for three of the appellants in EM (Returnees) Zimbabwe CG  UKUT 98 (IAC) [Judgment], the leading Country Guidance case on Zimbabwe, and for two of the appellants in RS (Zimbabwe – AIDS) Zimbabwe CG  UKUT 363 (IAC) [Judgment], on the lawfulness of removing people with HIV/AIDS to Zimbabwe. He represented the appellant in the leading case on the risk of re-prosecution in China to those convicted of offences in the UK, JC (Double jeopardy: Art 10 CL) China CG  UKAIT 00036 [Judgment].
He appeared in the Supreme Court as junior counsel in Al-Sirri v SSHD [Judgement], the leading case on the exclusion from refugee status of people accused of acts contrary to the principles and purposes of the United Nations. He also appeared as junior counsel for the first appellant in Youssef & N2 v SSHD  EWCA Civ 933  3 WLR 1532, relating to exclusion on the grounds of incitement under Article 1F(c) of the Refugee Convention [Judgment].
Alasdair acted as junior counsel in MP (Sri Lanka) v SSHD C-353/16  1 WLR 5585 [Judgment], a reference by the Supreme Court to the Court of Justice of the European Union, which the Court held that subsidiary protection must be granted where an individual is at serious risk of committing suicide on return, as a result of trauma resulting from past torture by state authorities, and where there is also a real risk of being intentionally deprived of appropriate care for the physical and mental after-effects of the torture.
Alasdair was also junior counsel for the first claimant in the leading case on the Home Office’s legacy programme, R (Geraldo, Aroun and Iqbal) v SSHD  EWHC 2763 (Admin) [Judgment].
He has also been instructed in several appeals before the Court of Appeal and Upper Tribunal relating to the correct construction of rules and legislation on deportation, including Chege (“is a persistent offender”)  UKUT 00187 (IAC),  ImmAR 833 [Judgment] and SSHD v MM (Zimbabwe)  EWCA Civ 797  4 WLR 132 (change of situation affecting asylum applicant; test applicable to deportation of mentally disordered offender) [Judgment].
Other leading cases include R (MG) v FTT (IAC) ('fresh claim’; para 353: no appeal) IJR  UKUT 00283 (IAC) (rights of appeal where SSHD refuses to treat further submissions as a fresh claim) [Judgment]; R (Osman Omar) v SSHD  EWHC 3448 (Admin) (lawfulness of Regulations requiring fee for Article 8 application by destitute person) [Judgment]; PR, SS & TC v SSHD  EWCA Civ 988,  1 WLR 73,  ImmAR 904 (‘second-tier appeals test’ for appeals to Court of Appeal; junior counsel for first applicant) [Judgment]; SSHD v AS (Somalia) and others  EWCA Civ 1319, Times, January 2, 2012 (appeal rights for those within the ‘legacy’ of previously unresolved asylum claims) [Judgment]; and Abiyat (Rights of appeal) Iran  UKUT 00314 (IAC),  ImmAR 822 (rights of appeal under s.83 NIAA 2002; rights of appeal to UT where FTT declines jurisdiction) [Judgment].
Alasdair has developed a particular interest in the interrelation between mental health and immigration law and in the treatment of mentally disordered people in the immigration system. His numerous cases in the latter area include Y & Z (Sri Lanka) v SSHD  EWCA Civ 362,  HRLR 22, Times, May 5, 2009 [Judgment], believed to be the first reported case in which applicants have succeeded in contesting removal under Article 3 of the ECHR on grounds of a risk of suicide and R (Y) v SSHD  EWHC 2127 (Admin), a successful challenge on ECHR grounds to the refusal of indefinite leave to remain to an applicant with severe PTSD and depression. [Judgment].
He was also involved in the first successful challenge to the refusal of the First-tier Tribunal to appoint a litigation friend to an appellant lacking capacity, which resulted in a declaration that the FTT does have the power to do so. He has also appeared before mental health tribunals.
Alasdair is a leading practitioner in asylum support, including judicial reviews of the Home Office and First-tier Tribunal relating to asylum support decisions, and regularly appears before the First Tier Tribunal (Social Entitlement Chamber). Notable cases include a challenge to the Home Secretary’s power to provide clothing to those on asylum support (R (AW Kenya) v SSHD  EWHC 3147 (Admin),  All ER (D) 392 (Nov),  ACD 33), as well as a successful challenge to the failure of the Home Office to provide travel expenses to those signing on at immigration reporting centres and numerous successful judicial reviews of adverse decisions of the First-tier Tribunal.
Alasdair is frequently instructed in proceedings in the Administrative Court and Upper Tribunal including in actions against the immigration authorities, challenges to decisions of the Upper Tribunal and First-tier Tribunal, and challenges to decisions of the Legal Aid Agency. Alasdair acts in challenges to age assessments by local authorities in respect of child refugees and in challenges to trafficking decisions by the competent authority.
Cases include SSHD v AS (Somalia) and others  EWCA Civ 1319, Times, January 2, 2012 (successful challenge in High Court to Tribunal’s refusal of jurisdiction to hear appeal, upheld by Court of Appeal) [Judgment]; R (MM, GY & TY) v SSHD  EWHC 3513 (Admin) [Judgment] (claim for judicial review involving the unlawful refusal of British citizenship to the family members of a person alleged to be an extremist: junior counsel);and R (Teluwo) v SSHD  EWHC 2762 (Admin),  All ER (D) 135 (Nov) (mistakes by Home Office inadvertently misleading tribunal, causing unfairness).