Profile image
Clare specialises in media law, public law, and employment law.

Clare has appeared in the Court of Appeal, High Court (led and unled), County Court, Crown Court and coronial courts. She is currently seconded part-time to Channel 5 where she provides advice on pre-broadcast issues and Ofcom complaints.  

In Hilary term 2021 Clare spent 3 months in the Administrative Court as a full-time Judicial Assistant. She assisted Mr Justice Chamberlain and other High Court judges and masters with a wide range of  public, media and international law matters, both procedural and substantive. In this role Clare drafted sections of judgments, researched discrete legal issues and discussed cases with the presiding judge(s).

From October to December 2020, Clare was seconded full-time to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain where she worked on all aspects of media and information law, including defamation, privacy, data protection and electronic communication regulation. 

Prior to joining the Bar, Clare spent four years working in public policy and human rights. She has variously worked at the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights, at University College London teaching public and administrative law, at a cross-party political office as a parliamentary legal officer, at The Carter Center as an election observer and at the European Union External Action Service’s Delegation to Myanmar as a political trainee.

What Clients Say

“Clare’s work has been excellent and her positive attitude is a tremendous bonus. We recommend her without hesitation and we will continue to instruct her in future.”

‘I have had a number of dealings with Clare recently and I personally think she is fantastic. She is great with clients and very attentive to detail. I would not hesitate to instruct in the future”

“I was very impressed not only with the result but the manner in which she had prepared the case. He was a difficult client to deal with and it was an awkward trial.”

Media Law

Clare undertakes work spanning all aspects of media and information law, acting for both claimants and defendants. Her clients include national newspaper and magazine publishers, broadcasters, NGOs, charities, and private companies. She accepts instructions in all areas of media law, including defamation, privacy, harassment, data protection and freedom of information.

Clare has significant experience of providing pre-publication advice in relation to both print and broadcast media. She currently advises Channel 5 (on part-time secondment), The Times, The Sun, The Guardian and Jewish News. She provides regular pre-publication advice to NGOs, companies, freelance investigative journalists and private individuals.

As a full-time Judicial Assistant in the High Court from January to April 2021, Clare worked on a variety of procedural and substantive matters with number of Media & Communications List  judges and Queen’s Bench Masters.

In addition, Clare spent three months on full-time secondment with Reynolds Porter Chamberlain in 2020, where she worked closely with the media team on a wide range of contentious and non-contentious matters.

In her media and information practice, Clare draws upon her experience before joining the Bar  working on free speech issues as a parliamentary legal officer, including the passage of the Investigatory Powers Act 2016 and the independent review into the Freedom of Information Act 2000.

Clare is direct access qualified and accepts instructions from both professional and lay clients.

Data protection / privacy / breach of confidence work:

  • Warren v DSG Retail Ltd [2021] EWHC 2168 (QB) – appeared in the High Court (unled) representing the Claimant in a strike out application in a claim for misuse of private information and negligence.

  • Phone hacking litigation – Worked on multiple claims against Mirror Group Newspapers relating to allegations of phone hacking and other unlawful information gathering activities. Clare drafted witness statements and hearsay notices, reviewed amendments to Particulars of Claim, and assisted with Defences (on secondment with RPC).

  • Cox Powertrain Ltd v Green – Assisted with an urgent application for interim injunctive relief against a current employee, namely a preservation order, an order restraining the disclosure of misuse of confidential information and an order for disclosure by affidavit (judicial assistant to Chamberlain J).

  • KEJ v The Chief Constable of X Police & the CPS – representing the Claimant in a breach of confidence and data protection claim for breaching her lifelong anonymity as survivor of ‘strange rape’ and disclosing her identity to the perpetrator (ongoing).

  • Advising a search engine regarding a de-link request and on safe harbour obligations following the UK’s withdrawal from the European Union.

  • Advising a dating app about its obligations under the ePrivacy Directive and monitoring for child sexual exploitation content.

Defamation work:

  • Regularly advise on and draft pre-action correspondence, on behalf of both Claimants and Defendants.

  • Millett v Corbyn [2021] EMLR 19 – appeal by the former Leader of the Labour Party against decisions made at the trial of preliminary issues (judicial assistant to Warby LJ).

  • Campbell v MGN [2021] EWHC 601 (QB) – trial on preliminary issues as to the meaning of an extract from a newspaper article (judicial assistant to Johnson J).

  • Davies v Carter – assisting Beth Grossman in ongoing  libel and harassment proceedings.

Open justice and reporting restriction work:

  • LM, AW & Ors v Ministry of Justice, Secretary of State for Justice and Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (County Court) – successfully represented the Claimants in a contested anonymity application.

  • R v Akle, Bond and Whiteley (Old Bailey) –  counsel for an NGO seeking remote attendance at a resumed jury trial in May 2020 pursuant to the Coronavirus Act 2020.

  • Re Contempt Application Against the BBC [2021] EWHC 170 (QB) – Divisional Court case in which the BBC was fined £28,000 for making and transmitting a six-second unauthorised recording of court proceedings (judicial assistant to Warby J, as he then was).

  • R (Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] PTSR 1251 – an application for a television production company to record and re-broadcast judicial review proceedings in the interests of open justice (judicial assistant to Chamberlain J).

  • As a pupil, Clare worked with her supervisor Jude Bunting on the Media Lawyers Association intervention in the Supreme Court in Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd v Dring [2019] 3 WLR 429 on third party applications for court material. 

Interim hearings:

As a judicial assistant Clare gained experienced across a variety of procedural matters, including:

  • Hiazi v Yaxley-Lennon – pre-trial review hearing determining multiple applications, including for non-party disclosure, relief from sanctions / extension of time, witness anonymity and a trial adjournment (assisting Nicklin J).

  • Whyte v CBS & Anor – CCMC determining directions to trial, costs budgeting, a Part 18 application, a confidentiality application and costs application (assisting Senior Master Fontaine).

  • Assisted Master Gidden, Master Dagnall and Master Sullivan with procedural hearings relating to various media law matters (data protection, libel and misuse of private information), including strike-out, anonymity and amendment applications.

Administrative & Public Law

Clare has a broad public law practice. She has represented a wide variety of clients, including Claimants challenging local authority age assessments in the Upper Immigration Tribunal, Defendants facing committal proceedings for anti-social behaviour in the County Courts, and children pursuing Human Rights Act claims following flawed care proceedings.

Clare has appeared both led and unled in the High Court. She has worked across all stages of judicial review proceedings, from urgent judicial review claims to strategic litigation. As a judicial assistant to Chamberlain J in Hilary term 2021 Clare gained an invaluable insight into the Administrative Court working on substantive judicial reviews, paper permission decisions, oral renewal hearings, interim relief hearings, and ‘immediate’/urgent applications. In addition, she was tasked with editing of the Administrative Court Guide 2021 providing her with a solid grounding to advise on procedural aspects of judicial reviews.

Recent judicial review work:

  • R (The Motherhood Plan) v HM Treasury [2021] EWHC 309 (Admin) (led by Jude Bunting and with Donnchadh Greene) – discrimination challenge to COVID-19 income support payments to self-employed mothers (appeal heard on 13 July 2021, judgment pending).

  • R (AA) v Hammersmith & Fulham LBC (2020) – successfully represented an unaccompanied asylum-seeking child in an age assessment challenge both at permission stage and in the remitted fact-finding hearing in the Upper Tribunal.

  • R (Good Law Project) v Secretary of State for Health and Social Care [2021] PTSR 1251 – challenge to the Defendant’s approach to procurement law and policy in relation to contracts and good and services awarded during the COVID-19 pandemic (judicial assistant to Chamberlain J).

  • R (GA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 868 (Admin) – challenge the Defendant’s refusal to disapply the law of Country X and to process the Claimant mother and children’s passport applications without the consent of their abusive father (judicial assistant to Chamberlain J).

Actions against public authorities:

Clare has represented a wide variety of clients, ranging from Claimants challenging local authority age assessments in the Upper Immigration Tribunal to children pursuing Human Rights Act claims following flawed care proceedings.

Clare has particular expertise in actions against the police. She has advised in claims concerning police assault, false imprisonment, malicious prosecution and failures to investigate. Clare has an interest in criminal justice related data issues and accepts instructions in this area.

Inquests and public inquiries:

Clare exclusively represents families of the deceased in coronial proceedings and is regularly instructed in contentious Article 2 pre-inquest review hearings and inquests. She has a particular interest in inquests arising from deaths in custody and following contact with the police. Clare also advises on civil claims following inquests and on judicial review of coronial decisions.

Recent work includes:

  • The Whyte Review (2021): instructed by British Gymnastics to assist in a large-scale disclosure exercise.

  • Inquest into the death of DG (2021): Instructed in a nine-day jury inquest. The deceased died by suspending himself from a railway bridge while intoxicated.

  • Inquest into the death of MH (2020): Instructed in a seven-day jury inquest. The deceased made a 999-call asking for emergency services, but there were no available patrols to send. He was later found suspended by his neck at home.

  • Inquest into the death of DA (2019): An eight-day death in custody inquest. The inquest revealed systemic failures to carry out observations recorded by prison staff in the ACCT log, which was the subject of a PFD report. The jury narrative highlighted five further failures in the care of the deceased, including one that possibly contributed to death.

Employment Law

Clare has a particular interest in proceedings concerning data protection, confidence/privacy and discrimination. Her experience additionally spans unfair dismissal, redundancy and pay-related disputes.

Clare’s work in this area includes:

  • Instructed on various advisory matters for both Claimants/Respondent to assess merits of claims for LEI cover (ongoing);

  • Assisted with an urgent application for interim injunctive relief by a company against an employee, namely a preservation order, an order restraining the disclosure of misuse of confidential information and an order for disclosure by affidavit (as a judicial assistant to Chamberlain J).

  • Assisted Paras Gorasia with a claim for breach of s.80G and s.47E of the Employment Rights Act 1996 in respect of an employee’s flexible working request.

  • Advising a Claimant regarding an application to strike out under Rule 37(1)(b) on the grounds that conduct of proceedings had been unreasonable, vexatious and/or scandalous.

International Law

Clare has expertise in public international law, with a focus on international human rights law. She is well placed to provide holistic advice on international law mechanisms, having worked in the Registry of the European Court of Human Rights, for the European External Action Service in Myanmar and for a cross-party political office as a parliamentary legal officer. She is currently an assistant editor the European Human Rights Reports (2018 – present).

Clare has been instructed to draft submissions to the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention and Special Rapporteurs in sensitive cases involving dual nationals (see here and here led by Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC and Jennifer Robinson).

In addition, Clare has a particular interest in the application of international law in domestic proceedings. As a judicial assistant to Mr Justice Chamberlain in Hilary term 2021 Clare worked on a number of cases engaging public international law and the application of international treaties. For example, R (GA) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2021] EWHC 868 (Admin) concerned the law applicable to the attribution of parental responsibility is governed by the 1996 Hague Convention.


Clare is an assistant editor of the European Human Rights Reports (here). She published a case analysis of R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice [2019] UKSC 2 in the European Human Rights Law Review (here), has contributed to the UK Human Rights blog (here) and is the author of a case law update for INQUEST Law magazine (Issue 40, Winter 2020) (here).