• R v Neill (November 2025, Teeside Crown Court) Represented Defendant accused of causing serious harm to a child. (BBC News)  
• R v Idan (June/July 2024; Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant accused of murder. (BBC News)  
• R v Hall (October/November 2023, Canterbury Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder and manslaughter in relation to homeless ex-barrister. (ITV News Meridian)
• R v Browne (June/July 2023, St Albans Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder during “honeytrap” robbery. (BBC News)
• R v Batler (May 2023, Manchester Crown Court): Represented Defendant charged with attempted murder during street shooting at Manchester Carnival. (BBC News)
• R v Miah (January/March 2023, Loughborough Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder in the course of robbery of cannabis farm. (BBC News)
• R v Nkrumah-Buansi (October 2022/January 2023, Woolwich Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder in the course of repeated robberies of drug dealers.
• R v Ferrier (September 2022, Woolwich Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder.
• R v Ali (June/July 2022, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder during a drug deal that went wrong.
• R v X (March to June 2022, Newcastle Crown Court): Represented 15-year-old accused along with nine others of murder at a local fair. The case was reported nationally. See ITV news coverage here.
• R v W – (February 2022, Basildon Crown Court): Represented bouncer acquitted of manslaughter whilst working at a club. The case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Leighton (October/December 2021, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant accused, along with her son, of murder in the course of a postcode gang dispute.
• R v Z (August/October 2021, Central Criminal Court): Represented 17-year-old Defendant accused of murder, along with four others, in the course of tit-for-tat attacks. Proceedings are ongoing.
• R v Y (July/August 2021, Central Criminal Court): Represented 17-year-old Defendant accused of murder, along with three others, of a random postcode attack in which a member of the public was stabbed to death. The case was reported by the BBC.
• R v X (June 2021, Harrow Crown Court): Represented 16-year-old Defendant accused of murder in the course of drug dealing.
• R v Spencer (April/May 2021, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder. Prosecution alleged Defendant was part of team responsible for the shooting of an innocent member of the public mistakenly targeted in the course of gang feud. The case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Harris (March/April 2021, Basildon Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder during the course of a bungled burglary of a cannabis factory. The case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Kudi (March 2021, Lewes Crown Court): Represented Defendant who pleaded guilty to the manslaughter of her 20-month-old child by abandoning her for six days to celebrate her 18th birthday. The case received national publicity including in the Guardian and the BBC.
• R v Francesco D’Agastino (September/October 2020, Brighton Crown Court): Represented Defendant accused of murdering his drug dealer, having previously sent a text to a friend stating, “Tonight I will commit a murder.”
• R v Vishal Thapar (January/February 2020, Leeds Crown Court): A three-handed cut-throat case, in which the Defendants were all charged with four counts of attempted murder, arson with intent to endanger life, and reckless arson. Defendant was prepared to plead guilty to reckless arson at the outset as he was caught on CCTV setting light to a house in which a family were sleeping. However, the Crown would not accept such a plea. After a six-week trial, he was acquitted of attempted murder and arson with intent and convicted of reckless arson only. The case was reported by the BBC.
• R v NK (November/December 2019, Bristol Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of county lines dispute murder.
• R v Choudhry (October 2019, Birmingham Crown Court): Represented Defendant accused of family feud murder.
• R v Khan (June to September 2019, Southwark Crown Court): Represented Defendant in retrial of UK’s largest immigration fraud and attempting to cheat HMRC of payroll tax in the region of £16.6 million. The case was reported in the Daily Mail.
• R v X (May 2019, Exeter Crown Court): Represented Defendant accused of murder.
• R v Welsh (April 2019, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant accused of murdering her husband. The case was reported by the national press including Mirror.
• R v M (January 2019, Northampton Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of rape.
• R v M (November to December 2018, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant accused of murder involving the use of knives and a car to run the deceased down. The case was reported by the BBC and the Daily Mirror.
• R v Khan (March to November 2018, Southwark Crown Court): Represented Defendant in multi-handed trial of UK’s largest immigration fraud and attempting to cheat HMRC of payroll tax in the region of £16.6 million. All other defendants convicted. Jury could not agree on K. Case reported in national press including Standard.
• R v A (January 2018): Represented Defendant in well-publicised prosecution for tax cheat.
• R v Abeka-Soares (November- December 2017, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant accused of knife murder. This case was reported by the BBC and the Daily Mail.
• R v Blackwell (September-October 2017, Blackfriars Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of alleged conspiracy to murder in which victim was shot on his driveway. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Mould (July- August 2017, Newcastle Crown Court): Represented Defendant accused of murder. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Morrison (July 2017, Oxford Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder, the jury having been told of his conviction for attempting to murder the deceased who had consequently been in a coma for 10 years. Press report at Oxford Mail.
• R v Laurent (June 2017, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder.
• R v H (2) (March to May 2017, Snaresbrook Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of large-scale immigration fraud.
• R v Carpenter (March 2017, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder. See press reports on Court News.
• R v Halliday-Fox (October 2016, Nottingham Crown Court): Represented Defendant accused of murder outside nightclub. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v H (1) (January – February 2017 Snaresbrook Crown Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of large-scale immigration fraud.
• R v Pike (September 2016, Cardiff Crown Court): Represented Defendant accused of murder. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Gomez (July 2016, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder.
• R v Rahman (July 2016, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant accused of murdering a business rival in 1997 having been extradited to the UK from USA. This case was reported in the Daily Mirror.
• R v Odunyemi (June 2016, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murder outside nightclub in Central London. This case was reported in the Daily Mirror.
• R v H (May 2016, Snaresbrook Crown Court): Represented Defendant in large-scale immigration fraud proceedings.
• R v O (February 2016, Central Criminal Court): Represented Defendant acquitted of murdering alleged drug dealer. This case was reported in the Evening Standard.
• R v Willis (November 2015, Hove Crown Court): Represented Defendant in conspiracy to murder involving a shooting. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Scott-Wasey (September 2015, Central Criminal Court): Murder raising defence of diminished responsibility. This case was reported in the Evening Standard.
• R v Bruzas (March 2015, Central Criminal Court): Double murder of husband and wife in their own bedroom after house was broken into. This case was reported in the national press, including by the BBC, the Telegraph and the Mirror.
• R v X (July 2013, Woolwich Crown Court): Represented foster carer acquitted of abusing children in her care.
• R v Marius (February 2013- June 2013, Central Criminal Court): Represented defendant acquitted of murder. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Kearns (May 2013- June 2013, Plymouth Crown Court): Represented defendant convicted of conspiracy to supply Class A drugs. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Mahmood (April 2013, Central Criminal Court): Represented defendant who pleaded guilty to preparing for an act of terrorism. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v D (December 2012, Reading Crown Court): Represented mother acquitted of causing life-changing injuries to her six-month-old child.
• R v X (October 2012, Woolwich Crown Court): Represented defendant acquitted of allegation of historic child rape.
• R v Laing (2012 Birmingham Crown Court): Represented defendant accused of planning and participating in attempt to lure and attack police officers during the 2011 Birmingham riots, during which shots were fired at a police helicopter. This case was reported by the BBC.

Further significant cases include:

• R v Gaskell (2011): Represented acquitted defendant accused of conspiracy to rig tender for supply of over £1 million of copper cable to Thameslink project.
• R v Malik (2011): Represented defendant accused of soliciting to murder by encouraging undercover police officer to fight coalition forces in Afghanistan. This case was reported by the BBC.
• R v Lee (2011): Represented defendant, as leading junior, accused of being part of gangland hit squad attempting to murder member of rival gang.

• R v Layden [2023] EWCA Crim 1207: Represented successful appellant in appeal for murder conviction, following a referral by the CCRC, based on the technical point that the prosecution had failed to have him arraigned after a Court of Appeal ordered retrial. The case is reported here.
• R v Lalchan [2022] Cr App R 12: Represented appellant in specially convened five-judge court dealing with the effect of the prosecution failing to obtain the consent of the Attorney General under s27(1) Public Order Act 1986.
• R v Deborah Winzar (November 2020): Represented appellant in a high-profile appeal against conviction, following a referral by the CCRC, for murdering her paraplegic husband in 2000 by allegedly injecting him with insulin without his knowledge. The case involved consideration of detailed medical evidence including evidence from specialists in spinal cord injury, chemical pathology, and endocrinology and has been reported in the national media and at (2021) 1 Cr App R 16.
• R v Wang Yam (July 2017): Represented appellant in a high-profile appeal against conviction for murder in controversial “secret” trial. The case had been referred by the CCRC and was reported in Newsnight and the Guardian and is the subject of the book “Blood on the Page: A Murder, a Secret Trial, a Search for the Truth.” See BBC coverage.
• R v A (October 2016): Represented appellant in successful appeal against conviction for sexual offences.
• R v Nealon [2014] EWCA Crim 574: Represented appellant in successful appeal—following a referral by the CCRC and based on fresh DNA evidence—against his conviction for attempted rape. This case was covered by the BBC, Guardian and the Independent.
• R v Laing [2014] 2 Cr App R 27: Appeal against convictions arising out of the Birmingham riots based on the prosecution use of videos to establish gang membership.
• R v Thompson [2013] EWCA Crim 1746: Represented appellant in appeal against conviction for murder, based on trial judge’s failure to leave the partial defence of provocation.
• R v Malik [2013] EWCA Crim 1649: Represented appellant in appeal against conviction for soliciting to murder, based on interplay between conduct of co-accused’s case and propriety of resulting summing-up.
• R v Hallam (2012): Represented appellant in his successful appeal against conviction for murder, following a CCRC referral. This case was covered by the BBC.
• R v Traynor (2012): Represented appellant in his appeal against conviction for murdering his wife, following a CCRC referral.

Further significant cases include:

• R v Cort [2011] EWCA Crim 1597: Represented solicitor in his appeal against conviction for murdering his professional partner.
• R v Lane [2011] EWCA Crim 2745: Represented appellants, following referral by CCRC, in their appeal against conviction for blackmail.
• R v Bailey [2011] EWCA Crim 1124: Represented appellant in appeal against minimum term imposed in relation to his conviction for murder.
• R v Mackinnon (2011): Represented appellant in appeal against sentence of imprisonment for public protection (IPP).
• R v Arafat Khan [2011] EWCA Crim 1260: Represented appellant in appeal against conviction for conspiracy to murder.
• R v Francis No 2 [2011] EWCA Crim 375: Represented appellant in appeal, following CCRC referral, against convictions for drug offences.
• R v M (2010): Represented appellant in successful appeal against conviction for rape. Appeal based on fresh evidence resulting from application to the CCRC.

Covid-19 Inquiry (2023 and ongoing)

Re RD (2016): Represented parents of man shot by the police after armed stand-off.

Hillsborough (2013 – 2016): Represented seven families during the Hillsborough Inquests, in which the 96 people who died were found to have been unlawfully killed. Peter’s questioning at the inquest received widespread publicity. He led the families’ questioning extensively on the topics of stadium safety, police failings in controlling the build-up of supporters, and police attempts to cover up the disaster.

This included questioning many of the senior officers involved in the disaster, including some of the match commanders (BBC 2, October 2014); officers involved in the immediate police PR response to the disaster (Daily Mirror, 20 April 2015); Sir Norman Bettison, former Chief Constable of Merseyside police (BBC, 5 May 2015); junior police officers (Guardian, 18 September 2014, ITV, 22 September 2014); and stadium engineers (BBC, 4 June 2014).

Wells (2010): Coroner’s inquest into death of patient detained under Mental Health Acts who was able to hang himself despite nominally being on five-minute observations. The jury returned a narrative verdict critical of the detaining authority.

Mola (2009): Coroner’s inquest into the death of a 23-year-old prisoner, who had been diagnosed with schizophrenia in his teens and died of smoke inhalation after setting fire to cardboard furniture in his cell. The jury verdict was critical of decision by prison staff to allow him access to lighting materials given his previous history of starting fires both during previous prison sentences and outside. The inquest also covered prison service policy in relation to use of cardboard furniture and inaction in relation to implementation of cell rescue equipment.

Fearon (2006): Coroner’s inquest into shootings at Turnmills nightclub in April 2003 raising issues of police response to information they had received in advance of the shootings. Jury found that that information was not “communicated effectively between the relevant parties”, and that better communication might “have led to a more proactive action plan”. This case was reported in the Guardian.

Member of 2010 Law Commission working party on Unfitness to plead—consultation paper No 197.

‘A timely reminder’, New Law Journal, 2008.

‘Fresh Evidence in Criminal Appeals—Pendleton revisited’, Archbold News, December 2006.

Article on the defence of provocation, Solicitors Journal, May 2006.

‘Criminal Justice Act 2003’, New Law Journal, 2004.

‘Fresh Evidence in the Court of Appeal; Pendleton—a Case Note’, New Law Journal, 2002.

‘Fitness to Plead Procedure: An adequate Protection?’, New Law Journal, 439.

‘Crime & Disorder Act’, LAG, January 1999.

Peter has also been called to the Bar in Northern Ireland. He studied law at the LSE where, following completion of his degree, he was the general secretary of the Student Union. He then joined Tooks Chambers, where he practised for 24 years before joining Garden Court in 2013.

Since 2003, Peter has been a part-time tribunal judge on the Mental Health Review Tribunal. He was appointed as an appraiser for Tribunals Service (Mental Health) in October 2009 and is on the Advisory Group of the Centre for Criminal Appeals.

Peter has provided Legal Advice in relation to Courtroom scenes for the BBC series Silent Witness and Rillington Place.