Supreme Court rules provision of approved premises discriminatory


The Supreme Court has ruled that the sparse provision of "approved premises” (formerly known as probation hostels) for women as compared to men is discriminatory. This is a really important decision and potentially paves the way for other discrimination challenges in relation to the way that women are treated in the criminal justice and prison systems.  


Henrietta Hill QC and Ruth Brander were instructed by Clifford Chance LLP, intervening on behalf of the Howard League for Penal Reform.


Read the Howard League press release.

Read the Supreme Court judgement.

Read the Supreme Court press summary.

« Back to listing

About cookies on our website

Following a revised EU directive on website cookies, each company based, or doing business, in the EU is required to notify users about the cookies used on their website.

Our site uses cookies to improve your experience of certain areas of the site and to allow the use of specific functionality like social media page sharing. You may delete and block all cookies from this site, but as a result parts of the site may not work as intended.

To find out more about what cookies are, which cookies we use on this website and how to delete and block cookies, please see our Which cookies we use page.

Click on the button below to accept the use of cookies on this website (this will prevent the dialogue box from appearing on future visits)