Arrest warrant withdrawn following appeal

Louise appealed the extradition order of her client who had been convicted for a minor fraud in Slovakia which took place over a decade ago. He had since built up a law-abiding life in the UK. She argued that, contrary to what was indicated on the arrest warrant, her client was convicted in his absence, without having been properly warned about his trial. As he did not have a right to a retrial, his extradition is barred under s.20 Extradition Act 2003.

Louise was granted permission to appeal, where immediately s.20 concerns were noted. At the full appeal hearing in the High Court, the Judge agreed with Louise that s.20 did not appear to be met in light of the further information provided by the Slovakian authorities. However, rather than ruling immediately, he decided to give the Slovakian authorities another chance to provide any evidence demonstrating that what was indicated on the warrant was correct, that Louise’s client had been deliberately absent.

The Slovakian authorities failed to respond within the timeframes set by the High Court. Following various adjournments, the Slovakian authorities ceased to respond altogether. Seemingly unable to provide the evidence required under s.20, they ultimately withdrew the warrant.

Louise was instructed by Harry Grayson from Hodge Jones & Allen.