Profile image
Claire specialises in all aspects of media and information law, including defamation, privacy, data protection and harassment.

What the directories say

Claire is ranked in both Chambers & Partners and The Legal 500 for defamation and privacy and for data protection.

“Claire is one of the leading juniors in her field. She is one of the stars of the future who has an excellent grasp of all areas of media and privacy law. She is a fearless advocate who is always capable of rising to the challenge.” Legal 500 2026

“Claire is an exceptionally bright barrister who is capable of handling a range of complex cases; she has very sound judgment and is able to provide sensible, pragmatic advice where necessary. She is good on her feet and an accomplished advocate.” Legal 500 2026

“Claire is very effective, she writes very well with a crisp, persuasive style.” Chambers and Partners 2026

“I am impressed by her advocacy; she is dependable, sensible and knows libel law inside and out.” Chambers and Partners 2026
 

Overview

Claire has represented clients in the County Court, the High Court, and the Supreme Court. She has also acted in ECtHR and international media cases. She acts for both claimants and defendants, including high-profile individuals, award-winning investigative journalists and national and international media organisations.

Claire has particular experience of acting for media organisations challenging reporting restrictions. She has appeared on their behalf in the criminal courts, the Employment Tribunal, coroners’ courts, family courts and the Court of Protection. In addition, she has significant experience of providing pre-publication legal and Ofcom advice to publishing houses, television and film production companies, and a range of print and broadcast media organisations.

In 2018, Claire was awarded a Pegasus Scholarship to participate in the Paris Bar Exchange. She spent one month with the media and information team at leading French law firm, Herald. She is a contributor to Arlidge, Eady & Smith on Contempt, 5th edition, first supplement.

Defamation
  • Courtney v Ronksley [2024] EWHC 572 (KB) - Counsel for the Defendant in a successful application for summary judgment on the Claimant’s defamation claim.
  • Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc [2024] EWHC 389 (KB) – Junior counsel for the Defendant, successfully opposing the Claimant’s application for summary judgment on a statutory qualified privilege defence.  Led by Jonathan Price.
  • Packham v Wightman and ors [2023] EWHC 1256 (KB) – Junior counsel for the Claimant, a well-known naturalist and television presenter, in the trial of a successful defamation claim arising from online allegations of dishonesty.  Led by Jonathan Price.
  • Packham v Wightman and ors [2022] EWHC 482 (QB) – Junior counsel for the Claimant, a well-known naturalist and television presenter, in a trial of preliminary issues in his defamation claim. Led by Jonathan Price.
  • Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) – Counsel for the defendant in a trial of preliminary issues in a claim for defamation, misuse of private information and harassment.
  • Peck v Williams Trade Supplies Limited and anr [2020] EWHC 966 (QB) – Counsel for the claimant in a trial of preliminary issues in a claim for defamation, malicious falsehood, breach of the Data Protection Act 1998 and negligent misstatement.
  • Feyziyev v Radu (2019-20) – Junior counsel for the defendant, an award-winning investigative journalist, in a defamation claim brought by an Azerbaijani MP. Led by Jonathan Price.
  • Stocker v Stocker [2019] UKSC 17 – Junior counsel for the claimant/respondent in an appeal to the Supreme Court in a defamation claim arising from allegations published by the defendant/appellant on Facebook. Led by Manuel Barca KC (One Brick Court).
  • K&K Hire Limited and anr v Radio Taxis (Southampton) Limited (2018) – Counsel for the defendant in a successful application for strike out and summary judgment in respect of both claimants’ claims in defamation.
  • Churchil Ltd v The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (2018) – Counsel for Ofqual in a claim originally brought in defamation, breach of the Data Protection Act 1998, and unlawful interference in business.
  • Osborn v Phillips (2017) – Counsel for the defendant in a defamation, data protection and harassment claim.
  • Obileye v Williams and anr (2017) – Counsel for the defendants in an application to strike out a defamation claim.
  • Wallwork and others v McDowall and another (2016) – Counsel for the defendants in a successful application to strike out a defamation action for Jameel abuse of process and failure to surmount the serious harm threshold in section 1 of the Defamation Act 2013.
Open justice and reporting restrictions
  • Berg v Tower Hamlets LBC [2024] EWFC 92 – Counsel for two BBC journalists in a successful application for access to documents and permission to report information relating to deprivation of liberty orders in the family courts.
  • Kirklees Council v P [2023] EWHC 3470 (Fam) – Counsel for the BBC successfully challenging reporting restrictions in respect of parallel family and criminal proceedings.
  • West Midlands Police v Christopher Mullin [2022] – Counsel for five media organisations, successfully challenging an order under s.11 Contempt of Court Act 1981 in the hearing of a production order application under the Terrorism Act 2000 (see judgment here).
  • LF v NHS Trust [2022] EWCOP 8 – Counsel for the BBC in support of an application to disapply reporting restrictions in Court of Protection proceedings.
  • Manchester University NHS Trust v Verden [2022] EWCOP 4 – Counsel for the BBC in support of an application to disapply reporting restrictions in Court of Protection proceedings.
  • Various Claimants v News Group Newspapers Ltd [2021] EWHC 3612 (Ch) – Counsel for the BBC and Guardian News and Media Limited, successfully challenging the imposition of privacy on proceedings.
  • PH and another v Brighton and Hove City Council and others [2021] EWCOP 63 – Counsel for the BBC and Sky News in a successful application to lift reporting restrictions (see further details here).
  • R. (Finch) v Surrey County Council [2021] EWHC 170 (QB) – Counsel for the claimant at a directions hearing before the Divisional Court, in contempt proceedings arising from the broadcast of video-hearing footage.
  • Re. MLA submissions to the Family Division’s Transparency Review (2020-21) – Junior counsel for the Media Lawyers’ Association, drafting submissions for the President of the Family Division’s Transparency Review. Led by Caoilfhionn Gallagher KC.
  • Re. PACE application (2019) – Counsel for the respondent media company in an application under s.9(1) and Schedule 1 Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 for audio-visual footage.
  • A v B (2019) – Counsel for the third party at a hearing in the Commercial Court, successfully obtaining restrictions on the publication of private information.
  • R v Lewis (2018) – Counsel for two national media organisations, successfully opposing an application for a reporting direction under s.46 Youth Justice and Criminal Evidence Act 1999.

 

Privacy, data protection and freedom of information
  • Dixon v Information Commissioner [2025] UKFTT 1002 (GRC) – Counsel for the appellant journalist in an appeal to the First Tier Tribunal under the Freedom of Information Act 2000.
  • Lawrence v Associated Newspapers Limited [2023] EWHC 2789 (KB) – Junior counsel for the Defendant, the publisher of the Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday, in claims brought by Baroness Doreen Lawrence, the Duke of Sussex, Sir Elton John and David Furnish, Liz Hurley, Sadie Frost and Sir Simon Hughes.
  • Warnes v Forge [2020] EWHC 1496 (QB) – see above.
  • Peck v Williams Trade Supplies Limited and anr [2020] EWHC 966 (QB) – see above.
  • Churchil Ltd v The Office of Qualifications and Examinations Regulation (2018) – see above.
  • Osborn v Phillips (2017) – see above.
  • King v Kogan Page Limited (2017) – Counsel for the defendant, successfully striking out a claim brought in the County Court under the Data Protection Act 1998.

Claire is also instructed on a number of confidential data protection matters.

Harassment
  • Lawal v Adeyinka and Coker [2021] EWHC 2486 (QB) – Counsel for the First Defendant, successfully resisting the Claimant’s application for an interim injunction in a harassment claim.
European and International Matters
  • Wikimedia Foundation Inc. v Turkey App. No. 25479/19 (2020) – Junior counsel for Wikimedia Foundation Inc. in an application to the European Court of Human Rights arising out of the Turkish Government’s access ban on Wikipedia. Led by Can Yeginsu (3 Verulam Buildings).
  • Re. Maria Ressa and Rappler (2019-) – Junior counsel for award-winning journalist and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Maria Ressa in ongoing proceedings including criminal charges of cyberlibel under Filipino law. Led by Amal Clooney, Caoilfhionn Gallagher KC and Can Yeginsu.
Media-related Inquests
  • Inquest into the death of Stephen Dymond (2019-2024) – Junior counsel for the family of Stephen Dymond, who passed away following his appearance on the Jeremy Kyle Show. Led by Maya Sikand KC.