Profile image
Fiona Murphy KC is ranked as a Band 1 Silk for Police Law (Claimant) and Band 1 Silk for Inquest and Inquiries in the 2026 directories.

What the directories say

Band 1 Silk - Inquests and Inquiries Legal 500 2026

Band 1 Silk - Actions Against Police (Claimant) Legal 500 2026 and Chambers 2026

Public Services and Charities Silk of the Year, 2023

“Exceptional … her experience of working as a solicitor means that she is particularly empathetic towards clients." - Chambers & Partners 2026

"A powerful advocate with a huge knowledge of the law, tenacious and determined." - Legal 500 2025

"An exceptional barrister. Her written work is excellent. She is extremely focused on the detail while having a good eye for the big picture. She is highly respected and regarded as a phenomenal barrister." - Chambers & Partners 2024

"Clients absolutely love her. A fierce advocate, incredibly intelligent and always a calming presence. A real joy to work with." - Legal 500 2024

"Fiona is just so respected in our world. She is tactically very astute; on her feet she is relentless in the most effective way." - Chambers & Partners 2023

Overview

Practising in human rights, private and public law since 1992 on cases involving state institutions: policing, the medical and nursing professions, prisons, probation and immigration services, social services and the building professions.

Representing individuals who have experienced bereavement, violence, oppressive conduct and neglect by state institutions in contexts including policing, mental health care (currently, the Lampard Inquiry), violence against women and girls (several recently resolved and ongoing cases concerning the positive, operational and investigative duties under Articles 2, 3 and 4 ECHR), police firearms operations and the Undercover Policing and Grenfell Tower public inquiries.  She acted for 77 of the families bereaved by the Hillsborough Disaster at the new inquests and for 600 claimants in the group litigation for misfeasance in public office against South Yorkshire Police that followed.  

Using private and public law remedies allied with alternative dispute resolution on behalf of victims of human rights abuses.

Resolving high value private law claims against police forces, local authorities, health authorities and private individuals (complicit in human enslavement) most involving complex arguments at the intersection between the common law and human rights, and she has been instructed in a range of public law challenges engaging  Articles 2, 3 and 8 ECHR, the police regulatory regime, race discrimination and/or women’s rights.

Fiona is head of our Inquests and Inquiries and Actions Against the Police teams. 

Before transferring to the bar in 2013, Fiona had been a solicitor for 20 years and in 1998 cofounded Bhatt Murphy, solicitors.  In 1992 she cofounded British Irish Rights Watch; an NGO dedicated to exposing violations of international human rights law in Northern Ireland during the conflict and to promoting transitional justice principles after the Belfast Agreement. 

Actions Against the Police and Public Authorities

Fiona has specialised in claimant police law since 1992. Her practice includes private and public law, inquests and inquiries. She has been involved in a number of the test cases in this area and has extensive experience of achieving successful trial outcomes and substantial out-of-court settlements.  She has extensive knowledge and experience in broader regulatory law contexts including in relation to the medical and nursing professions, prison, probation and immigration services, social services and the building professions. Many of Fiona’s most impactful cases have been out of the line of sight.

  • Loxton v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2025] 12 WLUK 105 2025
  • Chief Constable of Sussex v XGY [2025] EWCA Civ 1230 2025
  • Lowdham Grange conjoined inquests, 2025
  • R (O’Connor) v Panel Chair (Police Misconduct Panel) [2025] EWCA Civ 27
  • Lampard Inquiry, 2024 to date
  • R (W80) v IOPC and MPS [2023] UKSC 24
  • Attorney General of St Helena v AB [2020] UKPC 1 2020
  • Reay v Chief Constable of Northumbria [2020] EWHC 3246
  • Jermaine Baker Inquiry, 2019 – 2022
  • R (City of London Police Commissioner) v IOPC [2018] EWHC 2997 (Admin) 2018
  • TBS v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2017] EWHC 3094 2017
  • Grenfell Tower Public Inquiry, 2017 – 2019
  • R (Green) v IOPC [2016] EWHC 2079 (Admin)
  • Anthony Grainger Inquiry, 2016 - 2019
  • The Hillsborough Victims Misfeasance Group Litigation, 2016 – 2022
  • Undercover Policing Inquiry, 2015 to date
  • R (on the application of Rahman) v IPCC, [2013] EWHC 4696 (Admin)
Inquiries and Inquests

The representation of families at controversial inquests involving allegations of excessive force, malpractice and neglect is a mainstay of Fiona’s practice.

Fiona’s current and recent inquest and inquiry work:

  • Anthony Grainger Inquiry, 2020.  Conclusion reached that the fatal police shooting of Anthony Grainger by Greater Manchester Police was in contravention of Article 2.
  • Darren Cumberbatch, Inquest, 2020.  Resulting in a jury conclusion that Darren’s restraint related death in custody was contributed to by excessive force.
  • Undercover Policing Inquiry.  Fiona is instructed on behalf of several women who were deceived into entering into relationships with undercover police officers and a child born of one of those relationships.  She is also instructed on behalf of parents who have suffered the theft of their deceased children's identities to support officers’ cover “legends”.
  • Inquest touching upon the death of Azezur “Ronnie” Khan, Senior Coroner for Inner South London, 2016. 21-year old Ronnie Khan was caught in cross fire between rival South London gangs at a funeral in 2011.  The inquest jury concluded that a catalogue of individual and systemic failures by the Metropolitan Police - in  sharing information and in their risk assessments, planning and deployment of officers - significantly contributed to his preventable death.
  • Inquest touching upon the death of Logan Peters, Devon & Cornwall Coroner, 2016 Following legal submissions, the Coroner directed the jury that 22-year old Logan Peters had been falsely imprisoned by police officers shortly before he was found hanged. The jury concluded that errors, omissions and failures to comply with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act together with the use of “unreasonable, disproportionate and unnecessary force” contributed to his death. Further, that an unauthorised strip search and the failure to address Logan’s complaint “significantly contributed”.
  • Inquest touching upon the death of Hannah Evans, Senior Coroner for Warrington, 2016. The inquest jury found that Hannah’s death, while a detained mental health patient, was contributed to by multiple failures in planning her care and ultimately in failing to maintain the designated supervision level.
  • Inquest touching upon the death of Jimmy Mubenga, 2013.  Fiona was junior counsel on behalf of the family of Jimmy Mubenga Following an 8-week hearing, the jury concluded he had been ‘unlawful killed’ whilst under restraint by G4S officers. 

Fiona is currently instructed in several private and Human Rights Act claims on behalf of bereaved families and has extensive experience of resolving such claims. 

As a solicitor Fiona gained extensive experience in representing the families of those who have died in custody including Richard O’Brien (unlawful killing), Simon Allen (state neglect) and Kevin Jacobs (state neglect). 

In 2006, Fiona was commissioned by the Hon Mr Justice Blake to prepare an opinion for his review of the controversial deaths at Deepcut Barracks. 

Administrative and Public Law

Fiona has a specialist public law practice focusing upon decisions reached by the police and those responsible for police oversight together with public law issues arising from her involvement in inquests and inquiries. 

Recent cases include:

  • R (W80) v Independent Office for Police Conduct [2019] EWHC 2215 (Admin) (currently pending before the Court of Appeal) concerns the intersection between the policing Code of Ethics and the purposes of misconduct proceedings; specifically, the role of subjectivity and objectivity in assessing professional conduct.
  • R (on the application of City of London Police Commissioner) v Independent Office for Police Conduct [2018] EWHC 2997 (Admin). Fiona acted for the interested party, Alfie Meadows, in a successful defence of a decision by the IOPC to compel e gross misconduct proceedings against an officer in relation to a serious injury suffered by Alfie when he was struck by a police officer’s truncheon in the course of a student loan protest.
  • Northern Ireland Human Rights Commission's Application for Judicial Review, Re [2018] HRLR 14.  Fiona acted for Humanists UK, led by Caoilfhionn Gallagher QC in the Supreme Court who concluded that the Northern Ireland arrangements denying access to abortion in cases of rape, incest and even fatal foetal abnormality were in violation of Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
  • R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2016] EWHC 2880 (Admin).  A successful application for permission and interim relief in relation to a decision to permit a police officer to retire and thereby escape the reach of disciplinary proceedings.
  • R (on the application of Green) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2016] EWHC 2078.  A successful challenge to an independent IPCC investigation on irrationality grounds.
  • R (Rahman) v Independent Police Complaints Commission [2013] EWHC 4696 (Admin).  A successful judicial review of an IPCC’s independent investigation report which led to the quashing of the report and ultimately the finding of a case to answer for gross misconduct against the relevant police officer. 

Fiona’s work on behalf of bereaved families has also led to her involvement in a number of public law cases as a solicitor including R (Hurst) v HM Coroner for North London [2007] 2 AC 189 (which concerned the coronial jurisdiction to investigate Article 2 systemic failings following the conclusion of a related homicide prosecution and the temporal reach of the Human Rights Act) and R (Keith Lewis) v HM Coroner for Mid and North Division of the County of Shropshire [2010] 1 WLR 1836 (which concerned the means by which jury verdicts should be elicited post-Middleton).

Similarly, her work on behalf of victims of police misconduct led to her involvement in successful challenges to chief officers, the DPP and IPCC including in relation to a decision to permit a senior police officer to retire and thus escape the reach of misconduct proceedings (R (Coghlan) v The Chief Constable of Greater Manchester Police [2005] ACD 34) and to a decision by the DPP not to prosecute police officers (R v DPP ex parte O’Brien, RCJ 1997).